MAINSYSTEMS 
1. Core Concepts and Legal Context
In this video we will work through a concrete decision: produce a list of requirements for a whistleblowing channel. The aim is to explain the criterion used and apply it to a workplace situation. We will start with the concept, move to the procedure and finish with a case to solve. Setting up a channel involves people, procedures and technology. The platform supports operations, but the organisation still needs clear decisions on responsibilities, information protection and follow-up. This course covers preparing the service before receiving real reports.
The assessment starts with the legal framework and intended users. An organisation with several sites, shifts and service providers may need different access and communication arrangements from an entity operating in a single office. The channel must support secure reporting and follow-up. Practical accessibility depends on language, the available means and the ability to report without approaching a directly implicated manager.
Apply the following rule: Public bodies and, generally, private employers with 50 or more employees must establish, maintain and operate internal reporting channels. The threshold does not apply to employers within the specified sectors in the Annex. Employees counted for that threshold must be distinguished from the wider category of workers entitled to protection. The designated follow-up function must be impartial and competent.
2. Practical Application and National Rule
List employees, service providers and other relevant audiences. Identify people without work email, language needs and accessibility requirements. Distinguish legal requirements from service choices. Check whether the regime requires written reporting, oral reporting, meetings or a combination. For oral reports, confirm rules on recording, consent and approval of transcripts. Document the functions actually available. Before moving on, turn this procedure into a sequence you could explain to a colleague. Identify the first check, the action that depends on its outcome and the record that allows the decision to be reconstructed. Follow the sequence on screen and identify the point where an error would change the result.
A fictional factory has 120 workers, half of whom do not use a computer at work. Publishing only an intranet link leaves some intended users without practical access. The team proposes information in common areas, mobile-compatible access and a clear explanation of secure follow-up. Now read the case carefully. Separate established facts from information you would still need to confirm. Do not add motives or events that have not been described. This distinction matters when choosing a response proportionate to the information available.
3. Case Study and Key Decision Points
The exercise is as follows: What requirement is missing if the channel works technically but only office employees can find it? Choose an answer and write one sentence explaining it. During the pause, compare your choice with the criteria we have just considered. Also think about the material you would retain to explain the decision later.
Suitable access and communication for the actual audiences are missing. The needs assessment must document barriers and the proposed solution. The existence of an online address alone does not demonstrate that every intended user can use the service.
One mistake to avoid is: copying another organisation's requirements without considering the actual audiences and processes.
Now apply the national rule to a second decision. A subsidiary copies its foreign head office's policy without assessing its own activities and size. What must it check?
Identify the local legal entity, sector, national counting method and any public-sector or territorial regimes. Then link each obligation to a source and a responsible person. A group model can support operations but does not replace this assessment.
Remember these three points. First: Map the actual audiences. Second: Distinguish obligations from operational choices. Third: Test access for different users.
To apply this learning, retrieve the procedure used in your organisation or consider how you would create it. Identify one difference between that procedure and the case we have just resolved. Write down the change you would propose and the information needed to justify it. You can complete this short task in the handout accompanying the video.
The expected outcome of this unit is the ability to produce a list of requirements for a whistleblowing channel. Review the explained answer whenever you are unsure and keep the summary to support a future decision.
In the worksheet, connect your proposal to this video's national rule. Identify the document or platform field that would need to change and who should approve the change. If you conclude that it is good practice, explain the risk you intend to reduce. If you conclude that there is a legal duty, record its source and scope.