Learning objectives and content

1. Regulatory Concept & Core Standards

Today we will learn to write observable and assessable learning objectives. Throughout the video, consider the difference between knowing a rule and applying it to a decision. We will work through an example, identify a possible failure and develop a response that can be used at work. Training connects actual roles, risks and applicable duties to decisions at work. The programme proposes a teaching approach. It does not claim Croatian law requires twenty courses, five videos or identical duration for every person.

Knowing integrity is too broad an objective for one video. Identifying a conflict and selecting a declaration procedure is observable. The objective guides content, example and assessment. Proposed duration supports learning. This catalogue does not claim national law requires twenty courses, five videos or a fixed duration per unit.

Apply the following rule: Article 4 covers the listed EU-law fields, EU financial interests and the internal market. The 2025 amendment adds restrictive-measures legislation in the Annex and specified offences against the economy and official duties, embezzlement and bribery of representatives. Other breaches of national law are covered where they also threaten the public interest. Check the work-related context in Article 6, the protection conditions in Article 12 and the exceptions and special rules in Articles 4 and 5.

2. Practical Implementation & Procedure

Use an action verb for the objective. Select necessary concepts, one case and an aligned exercise. Define an adequate answer. Separate information to remember from resources available at work. Do not test an unexplained legal detail or one unrelated to the intended decision. Before moving on, turn this procedure into a sequence you could explain to a colleague. Identify the first check, the action that depends on its outcome and the record that allows the decision to be reconstructed. Follow the sequence on screen and identify the point where an error would change the result.

3. Case Study & Compliance Action

A module aims to teach reporting, but its test asks only the law's publication date. The team replaces this with a case requiring a channel choice and reasons for the information provided. Assessment now measures the relevant skill. Now read the case carefully. Separate established facts from information you would still need to confirm. Do not add motives or events that have not been described. This distinction matters when choosing a response proportionate to the information available.

The exercise is as follows: Which better assesses application: recalling a date or resolving a workplace situation? Choose an answer and write one sentence explaining it. During the pause, compare your choice with the criteria we have just considered. Also think about the material you would retain to explain the decision later.

Resolving the situation, provided it matches the teaching and has clear marking criteria. Dates may provide context but do not demonstrate procedural competence.

One mistake to avoid is: confusing the amount of information presented with demonstrated learning.

Now apply the national rule to a second decision. A report is automatically classified as protected because it contains the word corruption. What check is missing?

Read the facts and apply the national scope, context and conditions for protection. A form label helps organise information but does not determine the legal framework. If the case falls outside the regime, identify an appropriate route without unnecessarily disclosing information.