MAINSYSTEMS 
check contract performance after selection
1. Regulatory Concept & Core Standards
This video focuses on how to check contract performance after selection. Follow the sequence of decisions in the example rather than simply memorising a list. Notice who is involved, what information is needed and the expected result. These points help turn the content into a practice that another person can verify. Distinguish general purchasing controls from statutory public procurement. Current RHS principles require transparency, equal treatment and avoidance of conflicts harming competition. Examples do not impose an identical procedure or threshold on every purchase.
Risk continues after contracting. Amendments may change the bargain and invoices may not match delivery. RHS section 123 permits amendments under different grounds and conditions. One percentage or the parties’ agreement is not universal permission.
Apply the following rule: Section 10(3) prescribes three years and refers to feedback under section 11(4), while final-outcome feedback now appears in section 11(6). Do not conceal the cross-reference issue or automatically replace it with receipt. Document the legally confirmed starting event before automating deletion. Government Regulation 12 of 2 February 2026 covers the report, collected material and media, review of oral-report minutes and destruction under a procedure approved by the organisation’s head.
2. Practical Implementation & Procedure
Compare the amendment with the original and legal basis. Check delivery, invoice and payee. Assign approval of discrepancies. Assess public-procurement notices and avoid disguising an unlawful material change. Before moving on, turn this procedure into a sequence you could explain to a colleague. Identify the first check, the action that depends on its outcome and the record that allows the decision to be reconstructed. Follow the sequence on screen and identify the point where an error would change the result.
3. Case Study & Compliance Action
A large scope and price increase is added with vague reasons. The team checks whether a statutory ground exists or a new procurement is needed. Now read the case carefully. Separate established facts from information you would still need to confirm. Do not add motives or events that have not been described. This distinction matters when choosing a response proportionate to the information available.
The exercise is as follows: Does mutual agreement legalise every public-contract amendment? Choose an answer and write one sentence explaining it. During the pause, compare your choice with the criteria we have just considered. Also think about the material you would retain to explain the decision later.
No. Apply section 123 conditions. Agreement does not replace the statutory basis or required procedural steps.
One mistake to avoid is: ending controls once the contract is signed.
Now apply the national rule to a second decision. The system deletes every case five years after receipt. Is that correct for Estonia?
No. The three-year period in section 10(3) references feedback rather than automatically receipt. The current cross-reference issue needs a documented legal resolution. Apply Regulation 12 and privacy rules to related material and copies. Do not keep everything indefinitely without grounds.