Training needs by role and risk

1. Regulatory Concept & Core Standards

In this video we will work through a concrete decision: map training needs from actual roles and exposures. The aim is to explain the criterion used and apply it to a workplace situation. We will start with the concept, move to the procedure and finish with a case to solve. Training must help people make actual decisions. KPK guidelines define relevant integrity-plan training and familiarisation roles. Teaching methods are adapted to responsibilities, risks and accessibility.

Different people make different decisions. Procurement selects suppliers, finance validates payments, managers assess performance and channel teams handle sensitive accounts. Common training creates shared language, while specific preparation must address role and risk. Identify national or sectoral training duties separately from organisational teaching choices.

Apply the following rule: Article 9 generally covers entities with at least 50 employees. A threshold of at least ten applies to the specified principal healthcare, water, waste and environmental activities. Listed state bodies and municipalities are covered irrespective of headcount, and additional sectoral requirements exist. The trusted person, zaupnik, is appointed from employees. An external provider may receive reports, but purchasing a platform does not replace the trusted person’s statutory tasks.

2. Practical Implementation & Procedure

Connect each audience with its task, risk and expected action. Define what it should be able to do after learning. Consider new staff, contractors and absentees. At obliged entities include mandatory familiarisation under KPK guidelines. Before moving on, turn this procedure into a sequence you could explain to a colleague. Identify the first check, the action that depends on its outcome and the record that allows the decision to be reconstructed. Follow the sequence on screen and identify the point where an error would change the result.

3. Case Study & Compliance Action

The payments team completes a general introduction but cannot verify a bank-detail change. It needs an exercise tied to its own control. Now read the case carefully. Separate established facts from information you would still need to confirm. Do not add motives or events that have not been described. This distinction matters when choosing a response proportionate to the information available.

The exercise is as follows: Is a general lecture sufficient for every role? Choose an answer and write one sentence explaining it. During the pause, compare your choice with the criteria we have just considered. Also think about the material you would retain to explain the decision later.

No. Add practical objectives and examples for specific tasks. Basic knowledge and specialised skills complement one another.

One mistake to avoid is: choosing topics solely because videos are available without considering the entity's risks.

Now apply the national rule to a second decision. A subsidiary copies its foreign headquarters’ procedure without its own assessment. What must it check?

Identify the Slovenian entity, employees, public or private status and article 9 exceptions. Appoint the trusted person and define tasks. Shared technology or external receipt does not replace national obligations.