Module Learning Objective

retain necessary reasons without excessive data

1. Regulatory Concept & Core Standards

This video focuses on how to retain necessary reasons without excessive data. Follow the sequence of decisions in the example rather than simply memorising a list. Notice who is involved, what information is needed and the expected result. These points help turn the content into a practice that another person can verify. Conflicts can exist without proven corruption. Distinguish public-official restrictions from private policy. We use the law in force on 1 October 2026. Gifts have different categories and conditions; one amount is not universal permission.

Interest or gift records help verification when they explain decisions. Registration does not legalise a prohibited benefit. Minimise related-person data. Separate official-gift registration from a broader internal register.

Apply the following rule: Sections 11–12 protect the identities of reporters and persons concerned. The GDPR requires necessity-based retention. Adopt a specific document schedule considering archiving, procedural and sectoral duties. The Whistleblowing Law contains no universal five-year period for all reports. Assess attachments, exports and copies too.

2. Practical Implementation & Procedure

Record description, decision-maker, grounds and outcome. Limit access and link withdrawal or transfer. Define justified retention and review unusual repetition. Show whether approved, refused or unresolved. Before moving on, turn this procedure into a sequence you could explain to a colleague. Identify the first check, the action that depends on its outcome and the record that allows the decision to be reconstructed. Follow the sequence on screen and identify the point where an error would change the result.

3. Case Study & Compliance Action

The register describes a gift but lacks a decision or refusal evidence. The completed entry identifies the reviewer and explains return. Now read the case carefully. Separate established facts from information you would still need to confirm. Do not add motives or events that have not been described. This distinction matters when choosing a response proportionate to the information available.

The exercise is as follows: Does registration mean approval? Choose an answer and write one sentence explaining it. During the pause, compare your choice with the criteria we have just considered. Also think about the material you would retain to explain the decision later.

No. It may record refusal, return or an unresolved issue. Decision and grounds must be separately visible.

One mistake to avoid is: assuming every registered gift is allowed.

Now apply the national rule to a second decision. The system deletes every file five years after receipt. Is this a universal Latvian rule?

No. Define purpose, applicable procedural and archiving duties, starting event and review. Protect exports and attachments too. Completed examination does not automatically mean immediate deletion; indefinite unnecessary retention is also impermissible. Document exceptions and regular review.

National Legal Framework: Trauksmes celšanas likums, transposing Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law.