Module Learning Objective

maintain control of the case and communications throughout follow-up

1. Regulatory Concept & Core Standards

This video focuses on how to maintain control of the case and communications throughout follow-up. Follow the sequence of decisions in the example rather than simply memorising a list. Notice who is involved, what information is needed and the expected result. These points help turn the content into a practice that another person can verify. Handling a report requires continuity: each stage must leave enough information for the next. This course follows the team's work, distinguishing case administration, factual analysis and communications with the reporting person. The examples concern internal channels. The course addresses employer internal cases, with section 22 investigation and section 24 information requirements.

Internal investigation normally has a 30-day limit from receipt. A particularly justified extension requires simultaneous notice of reasons and expected completion. Investigation and section 24 information must still remain within three months. An interim status message does not restart the clock.

Apply the following rule: A written internal report must be acknowledged within seven days of receipt. Investigate as quickly as circumstances allow and at most within 30 days of receipt. A particularly justified extension requires simultaneous notice of reasons and expected completion. Even then, investigation and section 24 information must not exceed three months. Separate authority channels acknowledge within seven days subject to section 35 exceptions. Sections 36 and 3 generally require handling within 30 days, with a reasoned notified extension capped at six months. Do not combine the two procedures.

2. Practical Implementation & Procedure

Maintain a record of actions, dependencies and dates. Anticipate delays and check whether the law permits an extension, in which circumstances and how it must be notified. Describe completed or planned steps without exposing third parties. Check national rules on communicating the final outcome and requests for updates. Keep the version sent and evidence of sending. Before moving on, turn this procedure into a sequence you could explain to a colleague. Identify the first check, the action that depends on its outcome and the record that allows the decision to be reconstructed. Follow the sequence on screen and identify the point where an error would change the result.

3. Case Study & Compliance Action

The thirtieth day is approaching while a necessary specialist answer is outstanding. The team assesses whether the extension is particularly justified, simultaneously communicates reasons and expected completion, and schedules the remaining work within the three-month ceiling including section 24 information. Now read the case carefully. Separate established facts from information you would still need to confirm. Do not add motives or events that have not been described. This distinction matters when choosing a response proportionate to the information available.

The exercise is as follows: Is it enough to say ‘we are dealing with it’ without explaining measures or reasons? Choose an answer and write one sentence explaining it. During the pause, compare your choice with the criteria we have just considered. Also think about the material you would retain to explain the decision later.

No. Extension notice requires reasons and expected completion; outcome information requires the proper content. An interim status message does not restart the deadline or replace investigation.

One mistake to avoid is: assuming that a feedback deadline permits postponement of every other assessment or completion obligation.

Now apply the national rule to a second decision. The platform uses a fixed 90-day period for every country, starting when someone opens the message. Can this setting be retained?

Not without validating the local rule. Use the correct starting event and unit, distinguish acknowledgement from follow-up and allow only permitted extensions. Test receipt outside working hours, month-end dates and the responsible person's absence. Opening a message does not automatically change the legal date of receipt.

National Legal Framework: Panasztörvény (2023. évi XXV. tv.), transposing Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law.