MAINSYSTEMS 
produce a list of requirements for a whistleblowing channel
1. Regulatory Concept & Core Standards
In this video we will work through a concrete decision: produce a list of requirements for a whistleblowing channel. The aim is to explain the criterion used and apply it to a workplace situation. We will start with the concept, move to the procedure and finish with a case to solve. Setting up a channel involves people, procedures and technology. The platform supports operations, but the organisation still needs clear decisions on responsibilities, information protection and follow-up. This course covers preparing the service before receiving real reports.
The needs assessment starts with the legal framework and users. Different sites and shifts create different access needs. Under section 10, an internal scheme must allow written or oral reporting, or both. If oral reporting is offered, a physical meeting must be available on request within a reasonable time. External schemes have a different requirement under section 18: written and oral reporting, with a meeting on request.
Apply the following rule: Employers with 50 or more employees generally need an internal scheme. Ministry guidance uses the average over the four preceding quarters, counting employees regardless of working hours. New or substantially expanded workplaces use the available quarters. Sectoral rules may add duties. Section 10 requires written or oral reporting, or both. Where oral reporting is offered, a physical meeting must be available on request within a reasonable time.
2. Practical Implementation & Procedure
List employees, service providers and other relevant audiences. Identify people without work email, language needs and accessibility requirements. Distinguish legal requirements from service choices. Check whether the regime requires written reporting, oral reporting, meetings or a combination. For oral reports, confirm rules on recording, consent and approval of transcripts. Document the functions actually available. Before moving on, turn this procedure into a sequence you could explain to a colleague. Identify the first check, the action that depends on its outcome and the record that allows the decision to be reconstructed. Follow the sequence on screen and identify the point where an error would change the result.
3. Case Study & Compliance Action
A fictional factory has 120 workers, half of whom do not use a computer at work. Publishing only an intranet link leaves some intended users without practical access. The team proposes information in common areas, mobile-compatible access and a clear explanation of secure follow-up. Now read the case carefully. Separate established facts from information you would still need to confirm. Do not add motives or events that have not been described. This distinction matters when choosing a response proportionate to the information available.
The exercise is as follows: What requirement is missing if the channel works technically but only office employees can find it? Choose an answer and write one sentence explaining it. During the pause, compare your choice with the criteria we have just considered. Also think about the material you would retain to explain the decision later.
Suitable access and communication for the actual audiences are missing. The needs assessment must document barriers and the proposed solution. The existence of an online address alone does not demonstrate that every intended user can use the service.
One mistake to avoid is: copying another organisation's requirements without considering the actual audiences and processes.
Now apply the national rule to a second decision. A subsidiary copies its foreign head office's policy without assessing its own activities and size. What must it check?
Identify the local legal entity, sector, national counting method and any public-sector or territorial regimes. Then link each obligation to a source and a responsible person. A group model can support operations but does not replace this assessment.